Explain the Role of the First World War in the Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

exempt the region of the working universe state of warfare in the downslope and sicken of the Romanov Dynasty The utilization of the kickoff humankind in the settle and fare of the Romanov Dynasty has been contended debated. Russias pretermit of resources and dressing burn be seen to attribute to the collide with of the dynasty as miss of items much(prenominal)(prenominal) as start and coal ked to contestation amongst Russias people.Also impart was tsar Nicholas IIs drop of military machine friendship and ability to use military blackmail to crush the civil protests that were occurring in Petrograd, Russias capital city. The generals of the military along with the Duma utilize the protests to their advant mature to force the abdication of the tsar and strengthen Russias war effort. How ever, Russias turbulent past of political and kind turmoil also contributed to the pin and yielding of the Romanov Dynasty.The lack of preparation on Russias be fracti onal before the premier(prenominal) gentleman warfare began was an integral factor leading to the decline and conciliate of the Romanov Dynasty. For a war on a queen-sized scale, that cosmos the freshman World contend Russias lack of preparation severely crippled its efforts in the war with as legion(predicate) of 1 million of its soldiers departing for the eastern front without necessities much(prenominal) as Rifles or boots.In the mickle when soldiers were equipped with weapons they were oft stuck without the necessary ammunition to fire them, this would foretell the humiliating issuees Russia would suffer in the months to come with battles such(prenominal) as Tannenburg costing the Russian regular army as nearly(prenominal) as 230,000 groundless soldiers and many more than captured by the forces of the Kaiser. Russias second army chthonic the drop of General Rennenkampf executed a turn in after the demise of the some other half of Russian forces and whilst this was skilful 1. million hands met death on the eastern front, if non from the enemy then the crippling lack of food and starvation that face most(prenominal) soldiers of the Russian army. The news of these defeats did non go past on deaf ears back in the cities of Russia causing corking discontent amongst the travail and intelligentsia alike, Russia already had a ugly war records with a humiliation during the Crimean war at the hands of the Turkish and the juvenile Russo-Japanese war in 1905 some(prenominal) opprobrious defeats on Russias behalf.With news appallingct that these losses were macrocosm bettered on the eastern front it caused a questioning of Russias autocracy, the Dynasty of the Romanov family. The costless civilise of thought on the bowling pin of the Romanovs greatly highlights the signifi laughingstockce of the setoff World state of war on the reconcile of the autocracy and debate if the war was averted so to would be the give-up the ghos t of the Romanovs. Therefore it trick be safely asserted that the liberal school of thought elucidates that the lack of preparation by Russia in response to the origin World war contributed greatly to the eclecticist nature of the Romanov Dynasty and its eventual decline and fall.The lack of military experience by tsar Nicholas II as well as the disobedience of the Russian military is more or less of signifi open firet wideness to the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty. From an early age Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov was not groomed to be a traditional Tsar, his father Alexander iii saw his son as a weak link to the Dynasty and unfit to receive because of his weak personality and mind, those of the liberal school of thought agree entirely with this stating the flunk in the character of Nicholas ontributing to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. With elflike to no training in being the supreme autocrat of Russia it is a revere that Tsar Nicholas thought it wise to perso nally take the role of the commader in headman with no military experience as well, for the Russian people this was a unfounded move seeing as how the support war Nicholas had spear-headed led to a loss of hundreds of kilometres of trans-siberian railway and the colony of Korea in the Russo-Japanese war. hence upon the start of the First World fight despite a surge of nationalism from the Russian people when the Russian military performed consistently badly Tsar Nicholas was seen to be the cause. Already being investigated as a potential spy payable to his nuptials to the tsarina who hailed from Germany , the ridiculous performance of Russia during the World War which was under Tsar Nicholas reign is seen by the Liberal School as crippling to the intergrity and upkeep of Russias Autocracy and the Dynasty of the Romanov Family.worsened put away was Nicholas leadership of Russia during the time of the war, being unable to disband civilian riots in the capital of Petrograd a nd by refusing offers from the Duma at first during the February/March transformation secured his abdication which was obligate upon him by the military and the Duma cementing the lack of devotion Nicholas cabinet had to him as a issue of his sad leadership and military inexperience, which can be attributed to the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty. what is more the civilian protests in Russia as a reaction to the catalyst of the First World War were yet another precedent as to the fall of the Romanov Family and their dynasty. Russias history of dissatisfy peasants and proletariat provides a bleak foreshadow to the reaction the general public had towards the poor performance Russia turned in during the First World War and the lack of necessities such as food and coal that they had to fore-go due to poor preparation.It cannot be denied the crucial role that civilian riots had in the fall of the Romanov Dynasty, these riots can be traced to the 23rd of February 1917 as an position fair sex named Sybil Grey described the riots start as a poor woman entered a profit shop and asked for bread. She was told at that place was none. On leaving the shop, seeing bread in the window she broke the window and took it. This simple act of taking bread was the turning intimate in civilian protests and the birth itself of the Russian Revolution, soon the streets of Petrograd were litter with protestors and the Duma refused the Tsars orders to disband the protests via the military, many of whom defected to the protestors to avoid being sent to the east front.The food supplies in most cities were dire and the Russian economy was inflated to the point that most farmers refused to sell their wares in turn for money. Prominent Russian industry such as the Pulitov Steelworks also unsympathetic due to a lack of pay and raw materials meaning 90,000 proletariat direct had no jobs and no direction in social club, which inevitably leads to protesting.Therefore it can be easily drawn that the protests that occurred with the civilians in Russia compete an integral role in the decline and fall of teh Romanov Dynasty. Moreover Russias parliament, the Duma in conjunction with the Russian military officials many of whom were related to Tsar Nicholas himself used the First World War as a medium to force the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and attempt to govern Russia as a democracy.After the events of bloody sunlight in 1905 Tsar Nicholas II faced a dilemma, millions of Russians crying for replace and challenge his indicant and the power of the autocracy. It was in these caboodle the October Manifesto was issued to the people in hopes of fix down threats of insurrection amongst the people, the manifesto give Russia a parliament that was so nigh linked with the Tsar it had no habit essentially.However, during the failures that followed Nicholas in the First World War the Duma was essentially in power in the capital city of Petrograd with th e Tsar disjunct at a military tight in Tsarkoe Selo, finally reaching the big top of insurrection the Duma with the support of the Tsars trusted generals established a tentative government that attempted to repair the victimize the war and Nicholas had caused. To the tsar this was an ct of insurrection and military force was demanded to shut the Duma down, this was not the case. The military had lost faith in Nicholas, fearing he was disadvantaging Russia in their efforts against germany, it was then substantiate what must be hold oute under desperation from the war and the people the Duma and the military requested Tsar Nicholas abdicate his power from the throne, in its stead would be a government running on elections in replica of England.Another role the Duma play was their facilitation in the civilian riots occurring with some Cossacks, guards supposedly loyal to the tsar assuring protestors dont worry we wont shoot you and the guard of the royal family abandoning their posts. The quintessential role then of the Duma and Military as a result of the first world war in the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty cannot be denied.However, when studying the decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty other schools of thought beat differing opinions as to the significance of the War in the fall of the Romanovs. The revisionist school argues that the pre-existing and unresolved issues of Russias past greatly contributed to the decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty. Historian Sheila Fitzpatrick believes that even prior to the war Russia was in an unstable place, both socially and politically as she states The autocracys situation was precarious on the eve of the First World War. Issues such as the massacre of bloody Sunday were still contemporary issues for the Tsar and the autocracy, with labels such as Bloody Nicholas becoming household names, the activities of unhomogeneous ultra groups such as Vladimir Lenins Bolshevik party and the opposing Menshev iks of Leon Trotsky whilst fore-runners for change in Russian society both set a precarious panorama during 20th century Russia, much seek to ignite crowds or events into protests or revolutions.These often took the form of Assassinations with targets including Prime Minister Petr Stolypin often upsetting the established order and come down society into complete chaos. It can be seen then that the revisionists make a well argument as to why the Romanovs would have fallen even in the absence seizure of the First World War.The contention does not rest there though, the life story conditions of a vast majority of Russian society was also believed to be a contributing factor as to the decline and fall of the Romanovs, during the industrial revolution the conditions faced by the new class the proletariat or workers were seen to be inhumane, they were cramped into mall living areas, malnourished, exposed to dangerous work, shot at and payed incredibly poor amounts of money to guara ntee this cycle continued, they also made up over 90% of Russias population. It is unproblematic to see then that a large amount of society exposed to these conditions for the melioration of others would eventually lead to a revolution en mass which is what revisionists, amongst other things believe would have been equally if not more significant than the First World War in the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty.all(a) in all despite contention the role of the First World War in the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty can be seen as pivotal to some as Russias lack of preparation, poor leadership, riots and leaders were all influenced by the great war but is debated amongst others due to other factors such as conditions faced by the working class, the autcracys weakened position and revolutionary groups.